CALL: 0861 274 911

CSI Africa

CSI Africa

Polygraph Examinations | Background Screening & Verification

0861 274 911
Email: info@csinvestigate.co.za

CSI Africa
305 Braam Pretorius Street

Open in Google Maps
  • HOME
  • SERVICES
    • Investigative services
      • Private investigations
      • Fingerprinting & forensic investigations
      • Diagnostic polygraph testing
      • Evidence Collection & Analysis
    • Screening services
      • Background screening
      • Pre-employment polygraph testing
      • Periodic polygraph testing
      • Domestic polygraph testing
      • Criminal record check
      • Criminal Record Expungement
  • PRODUCTS
    • B-Verified
    • CarerCheck
    • CSI Safeguard
    • myScreening
  • ABOUT
  • BLOG
  • CONTACT
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Surveillance
  • Personal Surveillance: Are you allowed to record conversations?
December 12, 2019

News & Info

Personal Surveillance: Are you allowed to record conversations?

by Amelia Griesel / Friday, 24 November 2017 / Published in Surveillance, Sweeping & debugging

Ever thought of recording a conversation to protect yourself, or to expose someone else’s alleged wrongdoing? Perhaps you’ve dealt with dishonest service providers, or maybe you’ve got a gut feeling that your significant other is cheating – any evidence that supports your case is good evidence, right?. But how far can you go before your surveillance actions can be deemed illegal?

A few years back news erupted about a cellphone hacking scanadal involving a Pretoria-based divorce attorney, Selwyn Shapiro. According to reports, Shapiro allegedly revealed sensitive information about a male client’s wife and her friend. The information was obtained by Shapiro’s client who hacked into his then wife’s Blackberry – an action for which he was later criminally charged.

Face-to-Face Communication

Therein lies the first part of the answer: in good ole South Africa it is illegal for any civilian to record conversations to which he or she is not a party. In short, this means spying on someone by hacking their phone or computer could land you in hot water – even if it’s the other party who may be doing something wrong.

But that’s about as restrictive as current legislation gets.

The only real requirement to legally record a conversation is that you have to be a part of the conversation, or be in such proximity to the conversation so that the participants can be said to be aware of your presence. You don’t need any permission.

So what about communication to which you aren’t necessarily party?

Well, a few caveats apply. If you are recording communication to which you are not party, it will have to be proven that those party to the communication were indeed aware of your presence. And this can be a sticky issue since it’s hard to prove an awareness of something.

The sensitivity (another relative concept) of the information exchanged during the communication also plays a big part in establishing whether proximity can be argued. The more sensitive the information, the less likely it is that the individuals having the conversation would like it to be recorded by a third party.

In other cases, it’s pretty clear cut. The then wife of Shaprio’s male client grew suspicious of her husband after he beat (context: a race) her in filing for divorce. According to reports she had confidentially instructed her legal representative to issue summons to begin divorce proceedings. The shock came as a divorce summons was delivered directly to her attorney’s office from her husband’s attorney. She had never disclosed the identity of her attorney to her husband.

Electronic Communication (Video recordings, emails etc.)

Where electronic communication is concerned much the same applies. If you are in any way part of the communication (for example, being included in an email), or have the written consent of one of the parties to the communication, then keeping a record of that conversation can be deemed legal.

However, here too a number of caveats exist.

Indirect communication, which can be classified as any type of communication which isn’t face-to-face, covers a wide spectrum of media including data, moving images, other types of recordings, and so on.

Legally recording or keeping record of such indirect communication can make matters infinitely more complicated since there is no real way of making such recordings unless you are party to the communication, or use illegal means to obtain the communication, as was the case with Shapiro’s male client.

So, unless someone party to the communication (with the necessary authority and jurisdiction) provided you with explicit consent or a copy of the communication, it’s likely that recording such information would be illegal. But even if you receive consent, a matter of ownership can also be raised (for example, who owns the content of an email sent via a company address, and who has the right to grant access to that content?).

In conclusion, the simple rule of thumb is this: record your own conversations as much as you want, but give others their privacy. Otherwise you may get saddled with a legal dilemma of your own where you or your legal representative prove possession of information you really shouldn’t have.

0
  • Tweet
Tagged under: bugging, cellphone hacking, communication, recording

About Amelia Griesel

CSI Africa CEO Amelia Griesel is a member of the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners of South Africa (ACFE SA), and an active participant in the ACFE SA Science Forum. Amelia occupied the position of president of the South African Professional Polygraph Association for two consecutive years, and is currently the vice president of the South African Polygraph Federation (SAPFED). Through CSI Africa Amelia provides first class forensic fingerprint training to legal teams and private organisations. Amelia is a successful graduate of the Academy for Scientific Investigative Training.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • New limitations on credit checks for prospective employees

    New limitations on credit checks for prospective employees

    October 24, 2019
    These new restrictions on whose credit information employers can access …
  • CarerCheck Workshop – What schools need to know

    CarerCheck Workshop – What schools need to know

    October 17, 2019
    The aim of the CarerCheck workshop was to dispel the …
  • Time to weed out your “possession of dagga” criminal record

    Time to weed out your “possession of dagga” criminal record

    September 26, 2019
    Ever been arrested for possession of dagga? Last year's Constitutional …
  • When criminals slip through the cracks

    When criminals slip through the cracks

    September 5, 2019
    Can you be held liable for the actions of an …
  • How to apply for a Police Clearance Certificate in South Africa

    How to apply for a Police Clearance Certificate in South Africa

    April 4, 2019
    Applying for a visa? Moving abroad? The South African Police …

Screening Services

  • Background Screening & Verification
  • Criminal record check
  • Criminal Record Expungement

Investigative Services

  • Investigations
  • Fingerprinting & Forensic Investigation
  • Evidence Collection & Analysis

Polygraph Services

  • Pre-employment polygraph testing
  • Periodic polygraph testing
  • Domestic polygraph testing
  • Diagnostic polygraph testing

Contact us

Call: 0861 274 911
Email:info@csinvestigate.co.za
Address: 305 Braam Pretorius Street
Pretoria
0129

  • GET SOCIAL

© CSI Africa. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | PAIA (Section 51) Manual

TOP